TLS SUPERCHARGED MEDALLION STUDY
Introduction
This study evaluates the effect of The Light System (TLS) supercharging process on TLS medallions by measuring changes in bioelectric activity using Electro Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS). EIS is a well-established scientific method used to assess electrical properties such as impedance and conductivity, not only at the whole-body level, but also at the cellular and molecular level. It has been widely applied in studies involving both human cells (Yang, 2011) and water systems (Becchi, 2005), making it a valid tool for detecting subtle changes in bioelectric behavior. In this study, EIS is used to measure how energy emitted from a TLS supercharged medallion interacts with living human cheek cells (buccal cells). The key objective is to compare the measurable bioelectric effects of a medallion before and after it has undergone the TLS supercharging process.
Scientific Basis
EIS measures how electrical energy flows through, or is resisted by, biological systems. These measurements reflect the electrical charge of the external cell membrane, which is directly tied to bioelectricity at the cellular level. Changes in EIS readings typically fall into two categories which include increased electrical impedance (higher resistance) and increased electrical conductivity (lower resistance). Both responses are documented in scientific literature and are associated with beneficial physiological effects. Higher impedance has been linked to improved cellular integrity, fluid balance, and reduced inflammation (Yamada, 2022; Kim, 2025). Higher conductivity is associated with increased electron availability, antioxidant effects, and reduced inflammation (Jeong, 2013; Hsieh, 2019). This means that detectable changes in impedance or conductivity indicate that an external influence is affecting the body’s bioelectric state.
What This Study Demonstrates
This study is specifically designed to show the measurable difference in bioelectric impact between a baseline (uncharged) medallion and a TLS supercharged medallion. Using the EIS method, the results demonstrate that the baseline (uncharged) medallion produces only minimal effects while the TLS supercharged medallion produces significantly larger and more measurable changes in bioelectric activity. These changes are rapid (occurring within hours), substantially greater in magnitude, and detectable in both the human body and in water. This study uses a validated scientific method (EIS) to show that the TLS supercharging process dramatically enhances the energetic and bioelectric effect of a medallion, compared to its baseline (uncharged) state.
Methods
A 40mm TLS Tiger Eye Supercharged Medallion (the “TLS Medallion”) was placed on a necklace and worn on the body continuously for various amounts of time. In one experiment, the medallion was worn for 3 hours and then removed for an additional 21 hours while monitoring the energy of the subject. The effect of the energy emitted by the medallion on the human body was measured using the EIS method. In all cases, a baseline measurement of the body was measured at the beginning of the experiment. The same protocol was used for all studies. Impedance measurements were taken before and after each type of treatment and % change values were calculated relative to the baseline values. Each collected sample was measured in triplicate and the average value calculated. This exact process was used and applied to a baseline (uncharged) Tiger Eye medallion (the “Uncharged Medallion”) which was used as a control, since crystals themselves have intrinsic energy of their own which can affect both the body and water.
Results and Discussion
The Uncharged Medallion produced a modest 6.8% increase in impedance after one hour of wear, indicating only a minimal effect on bioelectric activity. In contrast, the TLS Medallion produced a 175% increase in impedance after just one hour of wear, representing a response approximately 25.7 times greater than the Uncharged Medallion (Figure 1).
Figure 1
This establishes a clear and measurable difference between the Uncharged Medallion and the TLS Medallion in just the first 60 minutes.
Magnitude and Speed of Effect
When worn continuously for a period of approximately three hours, the Uncharged Medallion produced a modest 8.6% increase in impedance, whereas the TLS Medallion produced a 382% increase in impedance in the same amount of time, representing a response approximately 44.4 times greater than the Uncharged Medallion, which was its peak effect (Figure 1). Such large effects are very rare. Most commercial devices on the market produce effects less than 100% and take much longer to reach such a maximum effect, if ever, let alone within 3 hours.
Persistent Effects of the TLS Medallion
After removal of the TLS Medallion, impedance levels gradually declined over time. However, a sustained elevated effect (~200%) remained for an extended period. Within twenty-four hours of removal, there is still a large 130% increase of impedance, indicating that the initial effect is maintained, and not lost. Based on the observed decay curves, the effects of a 3-hour exposure to the TLS Medallion are estimated to persist for up to forty-eight hours after removal (Figure 2).
Figure 2
It is concluded that wearing the TLS Medallion throughout your waking hours, while removing it during sleeping hours, will render the best results if you plan to use it daily to give your body the ability to continue reaching peak impedance daily.
Real & Imaginary Energies
EIS allows for analysis of both real impedance (energy dissipation) and imaginary impedance (energy storage). The data in Figure 2 reflects the comparison of both real and imaginary energies of water treated with the TLS Medallion for 24 hours. To obtain a complete characterization of the TLS Medallion, both need to be measured. Imaginary impedance is reported in the scientific literature and is known to give different information than real impedance about the properties of a given medallion. In nearly all cases, real and imaginary values parallel each other. This means that in response to a given treatment, both generally show an increase simultaneously or a decrease simultaneously. However, the data in this study indicates the opposite phenomenon: water responded to the energy of the medallion by increasing the real impedance and decreasing the imaginary impedance (Figure 3).
Previous observations from the Quantum Biology Research Lab indicate that when real and imaginary responses move in different directions, the system may be exhibiting nonclassical or quantum-like behavior. The results observed here are consistent with that pattern.
Conclusions
Using Electro Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), this study demonstrates that an Uncharged Medallion produces only minimal bioelectric change, while a TLS Medallion which undergoes the proprietary TLS Supercharging process generates rapid, large, and measurable effects. These effects occur within hours rather than days, are sustained over
time, and can persist for up to 48 hours after exposure terminates. The data also shows that this energy transfer is detectable in both biological systems and water, reinforcing the consistency of the findings across different mediums. Additionally, the observed impedance patterns suggest the presence of non-classical energetic behavior. Interpretation of the data suggests that the energy emitted by the medallion is quantum in nature and not electromagnetic. Overall, these results confirm that the proprietary TLS Supercharging Process significantly amplifies the measurable bioelectric impact of a medallion, producing faster, stronger, and more sustained effects compared to its uncharged state.
Figure 3
References
Becchi M, Avendano C, Strigazzi A, Barbero G. Impedance spectroscopy of water solutions: the role of ions at the liquid− electrode interface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2005;109(49):23444-9.
Catapano, A., Trinchese, G., Cimmino, F., et al., 2023. Impedance analysis to evaluate nutritional status in physiological and pathological conditions. Nutrients. 2023;15(10), p.2264.
Colic M, Morse D. The elusive mechanism of the magnetic ‘memory’ of water. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 1999;154(1-2):167-74.
Hsieh CH, Lu CH, Kuo YY, Lin GB, Chao CY. The protective effect of non-invasive low intensity pulsed electric field and fucoidan in preventing oxidative stress-induced motor neuron death via ROCK/Akt pathway. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0214100.
Jeong D, Lee J, Yi YS, et al. p38/AP-1 pathway in lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses is negatively modulated by electrical stimulation. Mediators of Inflammation. 2013(1):183042.
Kim KY, Cho W, Shin HJ. Effects of treatment on extracellular fluid changes in the lower extremities of patients with chronic venous insufficiency using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Medicine. 2025;104(33):e44028.
Naranjo-Hern.ndez D, Reina-Tosina J, Min M. Fundamentals, recent advances, and future challenges in bioimpedance devices for healthcare applications. Journal of Sensors. 2019;2019(1):9210258.D, Reina-Tosina J, Min M. Fundamentals, recent advances, and future challenges in bioimpedance devices for healthcare applications. Journal of Sensors. 2019;2019(1):9210258.
Tanaka K, Tanaka M, Takegaki J, Fujino H. Preventive effects of electrical stimulation on inflammation-induced muscle mitochondrial dysfunction. Acta Histochemica. 2016;118(5):464-70.
Yamada Y, Yoshida T, Murakami H, et al. Phase angle obtained via bioelectrical impedance analysis and objectively measured physical activity or exercise habits. Scientific reports. 2022;12(1):17274.
Yang L, Arias LR, Lane TS, Yancey MD, Mamouni J. Real-time electrical impedance based measurement to distinguish oral cancer cells and non-cancer oral epithelial cells. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2011;399(5):1823-33.
Wulandari D, Zarkasi A, Nurhanafi K. Impedance analysis for four types of mineral water using electrical impedance spectroscopy. Indonesian Physical Review. 2024;7(1):84-94.
